The optimistic framing of AI verification as infrastructure for peace overlooks the fierce competition to control it. The standards set by early movers will create new forms of geopolitical leverage and economic chokepoints, effectively choosing future winners and losers. The critical question isn't how this infrastructure will be used for peace, but how it will be wielded in the contest for global influence.
The push to establish AI verification systems as a neutral infrastructure for peace and governance overlooks the intense competition to control their architecture. While framed as a public good, the standards underpinning this verification will create powerful new forms of geopolitical leverage. The nations or corporations that successfully set these standards will effectively build new economic chokepoints, granting them the ability to dictate terms of access and compliance on a global scale.
This dynamic positions early movers to anoint future economic winners and losers. The central issue is not how this infrastructure will be used for peace, but how it will be wielded in the contest for global influence. The critical indicator to watch is which actors—state or corporate—take the lead in defining these foundational rules, as their control will shape the strategic landscape for the coming decades.
Get the complete cross-vector breakdown, risk assessment, and actionable intelligence.
Join ESM Insight →